<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Thoughts for a Fish, Part 1: What&#8217;s Wrong with Hip?  Plenty.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nathangilmour.com/hardly/2009/11/some-thoughts-for-a-fish-part-1-whats-wrong-with-hip-plenty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nathangilmour.com/hardly/2009/11/some-thoughts-for-a-fish-part-1-whats-wrong-with-hip-plenty/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:45:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Christian Humanist Podcast &#187; Episode 5: Emergent and New Calvinism</title>
		<link>http://www.nathangilmour.com/hardly/2009/11/some-thoughts-for-a-fish-part-1-whats-wrong-with-hip-plenty/comment-page-1/#comment-6180</link>
		<dc:creator>The Christian Humanist Podcast &#187; Episode 5: Emergent and New Calvinism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathangilmour.com/hardly/?p=3246#comment-6180</guid>
		<description>[...] Part 1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part 1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria</title>
		<link>http://www.nathangilmour.com/hardly/2009/11/some-thoughts-for-a-fish-part-1-whats-wrong-with-hip-plenty/comment-page-1/#comment-5437</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathangilmour.com/hardly/?p=3246#comment-5437</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just now catching up on podcast episodes and responses, so I hadn&#039;t read this yet. The thoughts here are great. The only thing I have to add is that currently, the acronym is sometimes LGBTQIA, the &quot;A&quot; representing &quot;allies&quot; of queer rights who may not necessarily identify as queer (I&#039;m using the term as a catch-all here) themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just now catching up on podcast episodes and responses, so I hadn&#8217;t read this yet. The thoughts here are great. The only thing I have to add is that currently, the acronym is sometimes LGBTQIA, the &#8220;A&#8221; representing &#8220;allies&#8221; of queer rights who may not necessarily identify as queer (I&#8217;m using the term as a catch-all here) themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
